Opposition To Request For A Pretrial Discovery Conference {LM.030} | Pdf Fpdf Docx | California

 California   Local County   Butte   Law and Motion 
Opposition To Request For A Pretrial Discovery Conference {LM.030} | Pdf Fpdf Docx | California

Last updated: 7/16/2019

Opposition To Request For A Pretrial Discovery Conference {LM.030}

Start Your Free Trial $ 13.99
200 Ratings
What you get:
  • Instant access to fillable Microsoft Word or PDF forms.
  • Minimize the risk of using outdated forms and eliminate rejected fillings.
  • Largest forms database in the USA with more than 80,000 federal, state and agency forms.
  • Download, edit, auto-fill multiple forms at once in MS Word using our Forms Workflow Ribbon
  • Trusted by 1,000s of Attorneys and Legal Professionals

Description

( LM.03 0 ) Page 1 of 2 ( E .D. 7 - 1 - 1 9 ) Mandatory OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR A PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE ATTORNEY OR PARTY WITHOUT ATTORNEY (Name, State Bar number, and address): FOR COURT USE ONLY TELEPHONE: FAX NO. (Optional): ATTORNEY FOR (Name): SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF BUTTE Butte County Courthouse One Court Street, Oroville, CA 95965 (530) 532-7002 North Butte County Courthouse 1775 Concord Avenue, Chico, CA 95928 (530) 532-7002 PETITIONER/PLAINTIFF: RESPONDENT/DEFENDANT: OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR A PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE CASE NUMBER: Plaintiff(s) Defendant(s) Cross-complainant(s) Cross-defendant(s) Other(s) Opposition to Request for a Pretrial Discovery Conference. Privilege is the basis for the refusal to produce documents and a privilege log is attached which complies with Local Rule 2.14(c). The parties have engage in the following meaningful meet and confer efforts prior to filing this opposition: (Describe in detail all meet and confer efforts including any narrowing of the issues or resolutions reached vie these efforts.) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com ( LM.03 0 ) Page 2 of 2 ( E .D. 7 - 1 - 1 9 ) Mandatory OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR A PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE A brief summary of why the requested discovery should be denied, including the facts and legal arguments in support is as follows: (Excepting a privilege log if checked above, no pleadings, exhibits, declarations, or attachments shall be attached.) It is understood that the filing of the Request for a Pretrial Discovery Conference tolls the time for filing a motion to compel discovery on the disputed issues for the number of days between the filing of the request and issuance by the Court of a subsequent order pertaining to the discovery dispute. Party received the REQUEST FOR A PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE on: . Date Pursuant to Local Rule 2.14(b)1, this opposition is being filed within five (5) court days of service on the Request For Pretrial Discovery Conference, extended five (5) days for service by mail, and has been served on the opposing party. Opposing Party was served with a copy of the OPPOSITION TO REQUEST FOR A PRETRIAL DISCOVERY CONFERENCE on: . Date I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Date: (TYPE OR PRINT NAME) (SIGNATURE OF PARTY/ATTORNEY FOR PARTY) American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com

Our Products