Final Order And Findings For A Parenting Plan {Parentage 333}

Superior Court of Washington, County of _______________ In re parenting and support of: Children: No. Petitioner (person who started this case): Final Order and Findings for a Parenting Plan, Residential Schedule and/or Child Support (JDPPCS) Clerk's action required: 1, 15, 16 And Respondent (other parent): Final Order and Findings for a Parenting Plan, Residential Schedule and/or Child Support 1. Money Judgment Summary No money judgment is ordered. Summarize any money judgment from section 16 in the table below. Judgment for Debtor's name (person who must pay money) Creditor's name (person who must be paid) Amount Interest Lawyer fees Guardian ad litem fees Court costs Other (specify): Yearly Interest Rate: ____% (12% unless otherwise listed) Lawyer (name): Lawyer (name): represents (name): represents (name): $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Parentage 333 Final Order and Findings for a Parenting Plan, Res. Sched. and/or Child Support p. 1 of 8 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 2. Court findings based on (check all that apply): Parents' agreement. Order on Motion for Default signed on (date): The court's decision after a contested hearing on (date): The following people were at the hearing (list parents, lawyers, and any guardians ad litem): . . Findings & Conclusions 3. Children Petitioner and Respondent are parents of the following children who will be covered by a Parenting Plan, Residential Schedule and/or Child Support Order: Child's name 1. 2. 3. Age 4. 5. 6. Child's name Age 4. Parentage established (Repeat this section for each child as needed.) Court Order ­ Parentage was established by court order for (children's names): on (date): by (name of court): Paternity Acknowledgment ­ The Petitioner and Respondent signed a Paternity Acknowledgment (Affidavit) for (child's name): that was filed with the appropriate agency of the state of on (date): The mother was married or in a registered domestic partnership when the child was born (or within 300 days before). Her spouse/partner (name): signed a Denial of Paternity that was filed with the appropriate agency of the state of on (date) . . . 5. Washington state deadlines for Paternity Acknowledgment Does not apply because parentage was established either by court order or by a Paternity Acknowledgment (Affidavit) filed in in a different state than Washington. (Skip to 6.) The Paternity Acknowledgment was filed in Washington state. a. Effective date -- The Paternity Acknowledgment (and Denial, if any) became effective (valid) on the date the child was born or the date the Paternity Acknowledgment (and Denial, if any) was filed with the Washington State Registrar of Vital Statistics, whichever was later. RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Parentage 333 Final Order and Findings for a Parenting Plan, Res. Sched. and/or Child Support p. 2 of 8 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com b. Deadline to withdraw The deadline to withdraw (rescind) the Paternity Acknowledgment or Denial has passed because: Everyone who was under 18 when he/she signed the Paternity Acknowledgment (and Denial, if any) turned 19 before this case was filed; and (check one): This case was filed more than 60 days from the effective date. . This case was filed less than 60 days from the effective date; but everyone who signed the Acknowledgment (and Denial, if any) was before the court to decide an issue about the child before this case was filed. The deadline to withdraw (rescind) the Paternity Acknowledgment or Denial has not passed. The petition was filed too soon. c. Deadline to challenge The deadline to challenge the Paternity Acknowledgment or Denial has passed because it has been more than four years since effective date. The deadline to challenge the Paternity Acknowledgment or Denial has not passed because it has been less than four years since the effective date. Check one: The court will approve parenting and/or support orders for the child because the court finds: The child's acknowledged father is the father, No court has said another man is the child's father, There are no other open court cases to decide who the child's father is, and Notice has been given to all other men who claimed to be this child's father. The court will not approve parenting and/or support orders for the child because the Petitioner failed to show (check all that apply): The child's acknowledged father is the father. No court has said another man is the child's father. There are no other open court cases to decide who the child's father is. Notice has been given to all other men who claimed to be this child's father. 6. Paternity Acknowledgment filed in another state Does not apply because parentage was established either by court order or by Paternity Acknowledgment filed in Washington state. (Skip to 7.) The Paternity Acknowledgment was filed in a different state than Washington. The Acknowledgment (check one): is valid under the laws of that state. is not valid under the laws of that state because: . RCW 26.26.130(7)(b), .375 Mandatory Form (05/2016) FL Parentage 333 Final Order and Findings for a Parenting Plan, Res. Sched. and/or Child Support p. 3 of 8 American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 7. Notice and jurisdiction over parents Notice was given to everyone with a legal right to receive it, and The court has jurisdiction over the parents in this case because (check all that apply): the Petitioner lives in Washington State. the Respondent lives in Washington State. the Respondent was personally served in this state with the Summons and Petition. the Respondent signed an agreement to join this Petition or other document agreeing that the court can decide his or her rights in this case. other (specify): 8. Jurisdiction over the children (RCW 26.27.201 ­ .221, .231, .261, .271) The court cannot order a parenting/custody order for the children because the court does not have jurisdiction over the children. (Skip to 9.) The court can order a parenting/custody order for the children because (check all that apply; if a box applies to all of the children, you may write "the children" instead of listing names): Exclusive, continuing jurisdiction ­ A Washington court has already made a custody order or parenting plan for the children, and the court still has authority to make other orders for (children's names): . Home state jurisdiction ­ Washington is the children's home state because (check all