General Judgment Of Dissolution Of Marriage

Judgment - Dissolution Page 1 of 15 (Aug 2019) IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON FOR THE COUNTY OF In the Matter of the Marriage or Registered Domestic Partnership (RDP) of: Case No: Petitioner GENERAL JUDGMENT OF and DISSOLUTION OF MARRIAGE RDP Respondent and Unmarried children 18, 19, or 20 years old (full names) This document was presented to the court: On the motion and declaration of Petitioner, the default of Respondent having been found and Respondent being represented by a guardian ad litem or other person described in Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 27 On the stipulation of the parties, as shown by the signatures at the end of this Judgment After a hearing held (date), at which the following persons were present: Petitioner Petitioner222s attorney Respondent Respondent222s attorney Other Children 18, 19, or 20 Years of Age Waived further appearance in these proceedings: (names) Fully participated in the proceedings and are bound by the terms of this judgment: (names) Signed and stipulated to the terms of this judgment as shown by the signatures below FINDINGS: A. The court considered the Declaration Stipulations Evidence presented and finds that: (Check all that apply) I. Irreconcilable differences have caused the irremediable breakdown of this marriage or registered domestic partnership II. At the time the Petition was filed: Marriage Only: At least one spouse lived in Oregon and that same spouse had lived in Oregon continuously for 6 months prior to the filing of the Petition. At least one spouse lived in the county in which the Petition was filed. Registered Domestic Partnership Only: At least one partner lived in Oregon and that same partner had lived in Oregon continuously for 6 months prior to the filing of the Petition. At least one partner lived in the county in which the Petition was filed. American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Judgment - Dissolution Page 2 of 15 (Aug 2019) or neither partner lived in Oregon and the Petition was filed in the county where { Petitioner Respondent} last resided B. Party and Marriage/RDP Information: Date of Marriage or registration of RDP: Place of Marriage or registration of RDP: (County, State) Current age of parties: Petitioner Respondent C. Children of the Parties (Children conceived, born, or adopted during or prior to the marriage/RDP and any children otherwise legally recognized as children of both parties) Name Year of Birth Age Additional page attached titled 223Findings C 226 Children of the parties224 Petitioner Respondent is not the father of, or paternity has not been established for, the children: (names) Neither party is now pregnant (or) Petitioner Respondent is now pregnant The other party is not the parent of the child due (date) D. Child Custody Jurisdiction Oregon has jurisdiction under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act (UCCJEA) to decide custody and parenting time matters because: Oregon is the children222s home state (all of the minor children have lived here continuously for the six month period immediately before this case was filed) Other: Oregon does not have jurisdiction under the UCCJEA because: American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Judgment - Dissolution Page 3 of 15 (Aug 2019) The court grants judgment as follows: The marriage or RDP is legally dissolved as of the date this Judgment is signed. The terms of this judgment are effective upon entry in the court register. CHILDREN NOTICE ABOUT PARENTING TIME AND CHILD SUPPORT The terms of child support and parenting time (visitation) are designed for the child222s benefit and not the parents222 benefit. You must pay support even if you are not receiving parenting time. You must comply with parenting time and visitation orders even if you are not receiving child support. Violation of child support orders and visitation or parenting time orders may result in fines, imprisonment, or other penalties. Help may be available to establish, enforce, and modify child support orders. Paternity establishment services are also available. Contact your local district attorney, the domestic relations court clerk, or the Department of Justice at 1.800.850.0228 or 503.378.5567 for information. Help may be available to establish, enforce, and modify parenting time or visitation orders. Forms are available to enforce parenting time or visitation orders. Contact your local court for information. 1. Custody and Parenting Time Custody of the children is awarded as follows: Petitioner and Respondent have joint custody of the following children: Petitioner is awarded sole custody of the following children (names): Respondent is awarded sole custody of the following children (names): Parenting time is awarded as described in the attached Parenting Plan, labeled Exhibit or to Petitioner Respondent as follows Parenting time will be supervised by Any cost of supervision must be paid by Petitioner Respondent Other: Petitioner Respondent is not awarded parenting time because it would endanger the health and safety of the children American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Judgment - Dissolution Page 4 of 15 (Aug 2019) Relocation Neither parent may move more than 60 miles further distant from the other parent without giving the other parent reasonable notice of the change of residence and providing a copy of such notice to the court, or The requirement of ORS 107.159 regarding notice of relocation is suspended for good cause Contact Information Petitioner and Respondent must each provide contact addresses and contact telephone numbers to the other and notify each other of any emergencies or substantial changes in the children222s health Good cause exists to suspend the obligation of the parties to provide contact information to each other Parental Authority The non-custodial parent222s authority under ORS 107.154 is suspended for good cause 2. Child and Medical Support and Life Insurance for Children A. Child Support Existing Child Support Obligation list court/agency, case number, and date of prior child support orders and judgments: No action is taken by this judgment regarding any prior child support order or judgment This judgment does not replace any existing child support order or judgment. Payment amount and schedule remain as ordered on (date of order or judgment): any arrears accumulated under the continued order or judgment remain due This judgment replaces the existing child support obligation because the existing orders and judgments were issued by an Oregon court or agency, one of the parents or children receiving support still resides in Oregon, and circumstances have changed since the orders were entered. Support is due as detailed in the 223Support Order224 section below. any arrears accumulated under the continued order or judgment remain due Other: Presumed Inability To Pay Under ORS 25.245 The parent who would pay support is presumed to be unable to pay because that parent: receives cash payments from a public assistance program including TANF or SSI is (or is expected to be) incarcerated (in jail or prison for at least 6 months) and has income less than $200 per month The presumption has not been rebutted and no child support (including cash medical support) is ordered The presumption has been rebutted, and support is ordered as detailed in the 223Support Order224 section below for the following reasons: American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com Judgment - Dissolution Page 5 of 15 (Aug 2019) Support Order No support is ordered for reasons other than the presumption of inability to pay or continuation of an existing order or judgment (explain): or Support must be paid : By Petitioner Respondent To Petitioner Respondent Adult Child Attending School (name) : On the first day of each month Starting the month following entry of this judgment or the date of servic e of this Petition The total monthly amount due is: $ (Child Support Worksheets are attached and incorporated, labeled Exhibit ) This amount is: the amount presumed to be appropriate under the support guidelines different from the presumed appropriate amount of $ because the presumed amount is unjust or inapp