Petition To Establish Non Parent Legal Decision {DRNPEC11f}

Name: Mailing Address: Daytime Telephone: Representing [ ] Self [ ] Petitioner [ ] Respondent For Clerk's Use Only IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ARIZONA, YAVAPAI COUNTY Regarding the matter of the Legal Decision-Making for ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Minor Child(ren) 1300DO Mother Father ORDER REGARDING PETITION TO ESTABLISH NON-PARENT LEGAL DECISION-MAKING Applicant This matter has come before this Court for an order regarding legal decision-making. The Court [ ] has taken all testimony and reviewed all evidence needed to enter an order, or [ ] has determined testimony is not needed to enter an order. THE COURT FINDS: 1. JURISDICTION. This Court has jurisdiction under the law because: [ ] it is the county of residence of the child(ren); [ ] other: [ ] This Court does not have jurisdiction. LOCO PARENTIS. [ ] Applicant stands in loco parentis to the child(ren). [ ] Applicant does not stand in loco parentis to the child(ren). Specific findings: 2. 3. BEST INTEREST(S) OF CHILD(REN). It [ ] would OR [ ] would not be significantly detrimental to the child(ren) to remain or be placed in the legal decision-making of either of the child(ren)'s living legal parents who wish to retain or obtain legal decision-making because Superior Court of Arizona in Yavapai County January 2013 Page 1 of 4 DRNPEC81f Use only most current version American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 4. CURRENT LEGAL DECISION-MAKING ORDERS. [] No legal decision-making order concerning the child(ren) has been entered or approved by a court of competent jurisdiction within a year previous to the filing of the Petition. A legal decision-making order has been entered or approved within the past year, but the child(ren)'s present environment may seriously endanger the child(ren)'s physical, mental, emotional or moral health because [] [] 5. Other: OTHER REQUIREMENTS. [] [] The child(ren)'s [ ] Mother [ ] Father is deceased. The parents were not married to each other at the time of the child(ren)'s birth(s) AND has been legally established as the father of the child(ren). The child(ren)'s legal parents were not married to each other at the time the Petition was filed. There is a pending proceeding for dissolution of marriage or for legal separation of the legal parents at the time I file this Petition. Notice was properly given to all interested parties. [] [] [] 6. LEGAL DECISION-MAKING/PARENTING TIME RESTRICTIONS. [] Supervised parenting time between the child(ren) and [ ] Father [ ] Mother is in the best interests of the child(ren) because [] No parenting time between the child(ren) and [ ] Father [ ] Mother is in the best interests of the child(ren) because [] If legal decision-making is awarded and A.R.S. 25-403.04 - 25-403.09 applies, this Court makes the following findings: Superior Court of Arizona in Yavapai County January 2013 Page 2 of 4 DRNPEC81f Use only most current version American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 7. Other: THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED: 1. [] Awarding legal decision-making for the minor child(ren) to subject to parenting time with the legal parents as follows: , MOTHER 1. [] 2. [] 3. [] Reasonable parenting time pursuant to the Yavapai County Child Access Guidelines; Reasonable parenting time pursuant to the attached Parenting Plan; Supervised parenting time. Supervised parenting time is in the best interest(s) of the child(ren) because unrestricted parenting time would seriously endanger the child(ren)'s physical, mental, moral or emotional health. [ ] Name of person who will supervise: 4. [] 5. 6. [] [] The cost of supervised parenting time shall be paid by [ ] Petitioner OR [ ] Respondent OR [ ] shared equally. No parenting time: No parenting time between the child(ren) and the other party is in the best interests of the child(ren) because any parenting time would seriously endanger the child(ren)'s physical, mental, moral or emotional health. Does not apply Court-ordered discretionary Parenting Time Adjustments: [] FATHER 1. [] 2. [] 3. [] Reasonable parenting time pursuant to the Yavapai County Child Access Guidelines; Reasonable parenting time pursuant to the attached Parenting Plan; Supervised parenting time. Supervised parenting time is in the best interest(s) of the child(ren) because unrestricted parenting time would seriously endanger the child(ren)'s physical, mental, moral or emotional health. [ ] Name of person who will supervise: 4. [] 5. 6. [] [] The cost of supervised parenting time shall be paid by [ ] Petitioner OR [ ] Respondent OR [ ] shared equally. No parenting time: No parenting time between the child(ren) and the other party is in the best interests of the child(ren) because any parenting time would seriously endanger the child(ren)'s physical, mental, moral or emotional health. Does not apply Court-ordered discretionary Parenting Time Adjustments: [] Superior Court of Arizona in Yavapai County January 2013 Page 3 of 4 DRNPEC81f Use only most current version American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com 2. 3. [] [] Denying the Petition to Establish Non-Parent Legal Decision-Making. Other: Date: Judge/Judge Pro Tem of the Superior Court Superior Court of Arizona in Yavapai County January 2013 Page 4 of 4 DRNPEC81f Use only most current version American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkFlow.com