Answer To Petition For Restitution {4-907}

CIVIL FORM 4-907 Supreme Court Approved June 16, 1997 1 4-907 2 3 [Sections 47-8-37, 47-8-40 to 47-8-43, 47-8-46 NMSA 1978] 4 5 STATE OF NEW MEXICO 6 ___________________ COURT 7 ___________________ COUNTY 8 9 No. __________ 10 11 __________________________________, Plaintiff 12 13 v. 14 15 __________________________________, Defendant 16 17 18 ANSWER TO PETITION FOR RESTITUTION 19 (Uniform Owner-Resident Relations Act) 20 21 1. Defendant should not have to vacate the premises because: 22 _______________________________________________________ 23 ______________________________________________________. 24 25 2. The amount of rent claimed by the plaintiff in t hi s26 action is not owed because: __________________________ 27 28 _____________________________________________________. 29 30 3. The damages claimed by the plaintiff in this action are 31 not owed to the plaintiff because: ___________________ 32 33 _____________________________________________________. 34 35 4. The defendant asserts the following counterclaim or 36 setoff against the plaintiff: ________________________ 37 38 _____________________________________________________. 39 40 5. Defendant requests s eparate trials on the issues of 41 restitution and damages. 42 43 ________________________________ 44 Signed 45 46 ________________________________ 47 Name (print) 48 49 ________________________________ 50 Address (print) 51 <<<<<<<<<********>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2 CIVIL FORM 4-907 Supreme Court Approved June 16, 1997 1 ________________________________ 2 City, state and zip code ( print) 3 4 ________________________________ 5 Telephone number 6 7 8 [Rule 4-907 SCRA 1986; as amended, effective August 1, 1992; 9 January 1, 1993; September 2, 1997.] 10 2